Google has tentatively settled a class action suit alleging that its US Play Store had violated US federal antitrust rules by overcharging customers. The settlement was reached ahead of a planned trial that was set for November and involves more than 30 states representing 21 million consumers.
According to Bloomberg, the proposed settlement is subject to approval from Google’s parent company, Alphabet, as well as collective approval from the 36 states and Washington, D.C. involved in the lawsuit.
Details of the settlement were not revealed, but the class action lawsuit claimed that consumers would’ve spent less on apps and had more options if it weren’t for Google’s alleged monopoly.
Google is currently battling multiple antitrust showdowns from earlier this year. One of them includes Epic Games’ challenge of the company’s enforcement of its Play Store app policies, which has yet to be settled.
Read more: Google’s Latest Play Store Suit Gets Class Action Status
Epic Games founder and CEO Tim Sweeney said in a statement on X that they are not part of the proposed Google Play settlement, but that they’d be willing to “settle and be Google’s friend in their new era” if Google ends their payments monopoly “without imposing a Google Tax on third-party transactions.”
Match Group, another company that filed a similar claim against Google, gave no comment about the settlement. But last year, Google settled claims with a group of app developers, agreeing to pay $90 million and make it easier for companies to tell their customers about lower prices outside of their apps. It also still allows rival app stores on its phones.
It’s unknown for now what the outcomes of these legal tussles with Google will be, but according to a statement from a spokesperson for the Utah Attorney General’s office, the settlement is “in the best interests of consumers.”
Source: BNN Bloomberg
Featured News
Prestigious Universities Accused of Price-Fixing in Financial Aid Scheme
Dec 18, 2024 by
CPI
Honda and Nissan Reportedly Exploring Merger
Dec 18, 2024 by
CPI
EU Regulator Fines Meta €251 Million Over 2018 Facebook Data Breach
Dec 17, 2024 by
CPI
US Antitrust Chief Jonathan Kanter to Step Down After Pivotal Three-Year Tenure
Dec 17, 2024 by
CPI
Sandoz Settles Price-Fixing Allegations with $275 Million Agreement
Dec 17, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Remedies After Illumina/GRAIL– The Thorny Question of Proportionality
Dec 17, 2024 by
CPI
Why Was Illumina/GRAIL Blocked in the EU? Reviewing The European Commission’s Assessment of Vertical Mergers in Light of the 2022 Prohibition Decision
Dec 17, 2024 by
Will Sparks
The Role of Uncertainty in the Future European Horizontal Merger Guidelines: Lessons Learned From Illumina/GRAIL
Dec 17, 2024 by
Svend Albaek & Daniel Donath
Illumina’s Light on Article 22 EUMR: The Suspended Step and Uncertain Future of EU Merger Control Over Below-Threshold “Killer” Mergers
Dec 17, 2024 by
Anna Tzanaki
EU-Level Jurisdiction Over “Killer Acquisitions” in the Aftermath of Illumina/GRAIL
Dec 17, 2024 by
Peter Whelan