Einer Elhauge, Apr 24, 2008
In a recent review of Global Competition Law and Economics, a book I co-wrote with Damien Geradin, John Kallaugher raises some interesting questions about the very premises of the book. These questions seem worth addressing because they go well beyond an assessment of the book to raise fundamental pedagogical issues about the best approach to teaching competition law in the 21st century. The fundamental differences are threefold. John Kallaugher argues that competition law courses should:
Featured News
Why Prediction Markets Are Keeping Compliance Chiefs Up at Night
Apr 3, 2026 by
CPI
Gaps in the National Polic Framework on AI Leave State Regulations in Limbo, Report Claims
Apr 3, 2026 by
CPI
Federal Judge Narrows Yardi Antitrust Lawsuit, Dismisses Out-of-State Defendants
Apr 2, 2026 by
CPI
Italian Regulator Fines Revolut €11 Million Over Alleged Misleading Practices
Apr 2, 2026 by
CPI
Justice Department Challenges Decision Stopping Anthropic AI Ban
Apr 2, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Competitor Collaborations
Mar 26, 2026 by
CPI
Between Scylla and Charybdis – Navigating Transatlantic Antitrust Currents
Mar 26, 2026 by
Tilman Kuhn & Niklas Brüggemann
Cartel Enforcement Moves Into the Labor Market: Trends and Implications
Mar 26, 2026 by
Andreas Kafetzopoulos & Caroline Janssens
Rethinking Buy-Side Antitrust “Group Boycotts”
Mar 26, 2026 by
Craig Falls & Brendan McGuire
Positive Collaborations: The Tools Available to Competition Authorities to Encourage Beneficial Interactions Between Competitors
Mar 26, 2026 by
Rona Bar-Isaac & Thomas Withers