By Stephen Cunningham | Bloomberg
For almost two decades, lawmakers in Washington have been pushing legislation that would rein in the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries. Facing a near-certain presidential veto, the proposal has never crossed the finish line. Things might be different now, given President Donald Trump’s frequent tirades against OPEC for keeping oil prices too high — the latest coming Monday — as well as the backlash against Saudi Arabia following the murder of journalist Jamal Khashoggi.
1. What would the legislation do?
The bill — dubbed the “No Oil Producing and Exporting Cartels Act,” or “NOPEC” — would empower the U.S. Department of Justice to file an antitrust lawsuit against OPEC for trying to control oil production or to affect crude prices. It would do this by amending the Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890, the law used more than a century ago to break up the oil empire of John Rockefeller. Even if the Justice Department were never to act on its power to sue, the mere existence of this option might be enough to force the cartel to change its behavior.
2. Does this proposal have a chance of becoming law?
It’s come close in the past. Versions of the bill were approved by the House of Representatives in 2007 in a 345-72 vote, then by the Senate by 70-23, but the idea got no further under a veto threat by President George W. Bush. Trump, though, supported the NOPEC idea before becoming president, and OPEC has been a frequent target of his on Twitter.
3. What are oil prices doing?
The market has rallied almost 24% this year on the back of OPEC production cuts, sanctions against Venezuela and optimism over trade talks between the U.S. and China. That’s what prompted Trump’s latest twitter intervention, which sent prices down as much as 2.7 percent. Prices had previously been falling since reaching the highest in almost four years in October.
4. Where do things stand?
The NOPEC bill was approved by the House Judiciary Committee on Feb. 7 and is awaiting a potential vote by the full House. A similar bill has been introduced in the Senate. The White House has yet to set out its stance on the proposed bill. The Justice Department said at the end of last year that the administration “continues to study” the legislation.
5. Who opposes NOPEC?
Both the American Petroleum Institute and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce have come out strongly against the bill, fearing retaliatory action against U.S. companies abroad if it becomes law. Given the U.S. is now the biggest oil and natural gas producer in the world, they also argue that OPEC has lost some of its sway over world markets. U.S. shale producers also benefit from OPEC’s discipline in bolstering prices when they fall too low without any of the risk.
Featured News
Judge Appoints Law Firms to Lead Consumer Antitrust Litigation Against Apple
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Epic Health Systems Seeks Dismissal of Antitrust Suit Filed by Particle Health
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Qualcomm Secures Partial Victory in Licensing Dispute with Arm, Jury Splits on Key Issues
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Google Proposes Revised Revenue-Sharing Limits Amid Antitrust Battle
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Japan’s Antitrust Authority Expected to Sanction Google Over Monopoly Practices
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand