Identifying, Challenging, and Assigning Political Responsibility for State Regulation Restricting Competition
Maureen Ohlhausen, Nov 01, 2006
This paper examines the role of competition advocacy in combating anticompetitive state regulation. Looking at the constraints facing competition officials such as the state action doctrine, the analysis suggests potential avenues for surmounting these constraints. Relying on experience as the Director of the U.S. Federal Trade Commission’s Office of Policy Planning, the author uses real-world examples—real estate brokerage and interstate direct shipment of wine—to demonstrate the ability of a competition agency to use a variety of techniques to improve consumer welfare when enforcement is circumscribed due to state activity.
Links to Full Content
- Ohlhausen (Nov. 2006)
- Identifying, Challenging, and Assigning Political Responsibility for State Regulation Restricting Competition
Featured News
Trump Taps Antitrust Veteran Gail Slater to Lead DOJ’s Monopoly Battles
Dec 4, 2024 by
CPI
Trump Vows to Block Nippon Steel’s Acquisition of US Steel
Dec 4, 2024 by
CPI
Microsoft Demands FTC Investigation into Alleged Antitrust Probe Leak
Dec 3, 2024 by
CPI
American Express Must Face Class Action Lawsuit, US Judge Rules
Dec 3, 2024 by
CPI
Ted Cruz Seeks Probe into European Influence on US AI Laws
Dec 3, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Moats & Entrenchment
Nov 29, 2024 by
CPI
Assessing the Potential for Antitrust Moats and Trenches in the Generative AI Industry
Nov 29, 2024 by
Allison Holt, Sushrut Jain & Ashley Zhou
How SEP Hold-up Can Lead to Entrenchment
Nov 29, 2024 by
Jay Jurata, Elena Kamenir & Christie Boyden
The Role of Moats in Unlocking Economic Growth
Nov 29, 2024 by
CPI
Overcoming Moats and Entrenchment: Disruptive Innovation in Generative AI May Be More Successful than Regulation
Nov 29, 2024 by
Simon Chisholm & Charlie Whitehead