Posted by Social Science Research Network
Japanese Cartel Control in Transition – Mel Marquis (European University Institute ; European University Institute – Department of Law) and Tadashi Shiraishi (University of Tokyo – Graduate Schools for Law and Politics)
ABSTRACT: This paper has two main objectives. First, we explain the reasons for the renaissance in Japanese competition law enforcement, and second, we provide an overview of Japan’s anti-cartel regime. With regard to the first objective, in Part 1 of the paper we note the significance of the Strategic Impediment Initiative talks between Japan and the U.S. but we characterize those talks as a second-order factor, underlining instead the deeper issue of Japan’s stagnant economy. We observe that the old cultural assumption that economic recovery is possible without a genuine commitment to competitive markets and an effective competition policy has largely been overcome, and that this shifting economic ethos has enabled the JFTC to become a relatively more assertive enforcer. Additional factors highlighted include the leadership (2002-2012) of the former Chairman of the JFTC, and other influences such as the OECD’s evaluations of Japanese regulatory reform. As concerns the second objective of the paper, in Parts 2 and 3 we explain the basics of Japan’s anti-cartel regime. We review, inter alia, the rules on ‘substantial restraints on competition’ and the JFTC’s powers when it investigates and sanctions illegal conduct – either in cartel scenarios or, notoriously in Japan, bidrigging cases. Finally, in Part 4 we highlight recent developments such as the JFTC’s managerial transition under a new Chairman, and we briefly report on the amendments made to the Anti-Monopoly Act in December of 2013.
Featured News
Judge Appoints Law Firms to Lead Consumer Antitrust Litigation Against Apple
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Epic Health Systems Seeks Dismissal of Antitrust Suit Filed by Particle Health
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Qualcomm Secures Partial Victory in Licensing Dispute with Arm, Jury Splits on Key Issues
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Google Proposes Revised Revenue-Sharing Limits Amid Antitrust Battle
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Japan’s Antitrust Authority Expected to Sanction Google Over Monopoly Practices
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand