Glen Weyl, Alexander White, Jan 30, 2015
Many of the leading controversies in competition policy in the last two decades, especially those surrounding the Microsoft case, reflect the challenges posed by platform industries. Unfortunately, too often economists and policymakers have drawn the wrong lessons when thinking about such industries. Central to our analysis is a more realistic view of the process of consumer coordination. Platforms often use “usage revenue later” strategies to ensure that consumers coordinate on their platform. This greatly mitigates the possibility of inefficient lock-in or excessive dominance by a leading platform, but it makes inefficient fragmentation a greater danger. Thus regulation, rather than competition policy, may be more appropriate in addressing potential market failures arising in platform industries.
Featured News
Hogan Lovells and Cadwalader Unveil Proposed Merger Creating Top-Five Law Firm
Jan 4, 2026 by
CPI
South Korea to Sharply Raise Fines for Price-Fixing and Unfair Trade Practices
Jan 4, 2026 by
CPI
Lawmakers Blast USDA Move Ending State Partnership Aimed at Food Market Competition
Jan 4, 2026 by
CPI
Federal Judge Lays Out Rules for States Challenging HPE–Juniper Deal
Jan 2, 2026 by
CPI
Federal Antitrust Suit Targeting Aircraft Engine Sales Practices Is Settled
Dec 31, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 16, 2025 by
CPI
Learning from Divergence: The Role of Cross-Country Comparisons in the Evaluation of the DMA
Dec 16, 2025 by
Federico Bruni
New Regulatory Tools for the EU Foreign Direct Investment Screening and Foreign Subsidies Regulation
Dec 16, 2025 by
Ioannis Kokkoris
“Suite Dreams”: Market Definition and Complementarity in the Digital Age
Dec 16, 2025 by
Romain Bizet & Matteo Foschi
The Interaction Between Competition Policy and Consumer Protection: Institutional Design, Behavioral Insights, and Emerging Challenges in Digital Markets
Dec 16, 2025 by
Alessandra Tonazzi