Market Definition in Differentiated Goods When the Final Consumer Buys the Good: Insights from the H&R Block Case
Posted by Social Science Research Network
Market Definition in Differentiated Goods When the Final Consumer Buys the Good: Insights from the H&R Block Case – Malcolm B. Coate (US Federal Trade Commission)
ABSTRACT: This paper addresses the development of market definition analysis in three recent merger cases (Staples, Whole Foods, and H&R Block). The discussion traces the evolution of the market concept from the naïve Brown Shoe criteria to a price discrimination analysis implicit in Staples to the current application of diversion theory in the H&R Block case. By replacing fact with theory, this theoretical approach runs the risk of returning to the world of Brown Shoe. Additional discussion of H&R Block suggests that price discrimination remains relevant and could have been developed through further factual study. Moreover, even if theory is used to define a narrow market, the analyst must address a range of entry issues before concluding that the merger is likely to substantially lessen competition.
Featured News
Norton Rose Adds Antitrust Partners in Italy
Jan 20, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Lawsuit Over Google’s Search Monopoly Proceeds in CA Court
Jan 20, 2025 by
CPI
Digital Markets Act at Two Years: Enforcement in a Shifting Political Climate
Jan 20, 2025 by
CPI
EU Expands Tech Oversight with Updated Anti-Hate Speech Code
Jan 20, 2025 by
CPI
Cargill Settles Turkey Price-Fixing Lawsuit for $32.5 Million
Jan 20, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Pharmacy Benefit Managers
Jan 20, 2025 by
CPI
Untangling the PBM Mess
Jan 20, 2025 by
CPI
Using Data, Not Anecdotes, to Analyze Criticisms of Pharmacy Benefit Managers
Jan 20, 2025 by
CPI
Vertical Integration and PBMs: What, Me Worry?
Jan 20, 2025 by
CPI
The Economics of Benefit Management in Prescription-Drug Markets
Jan 20, 2025 by
CPI