Mexico’s Supreme Court of Justice (SCJN) has announced that it will soon resolve one of the most controversial issues raised by the 2013 reform to telecommunications – the ’Zero Rate’, established by art. 131 of the Federal Law of Telecommunications and Broadcasting. This rule establishes that the economic agents designated as preponderant (in this case Carlos Slim’s América Móvil), will not be allowed to charge their competitors for calls terminating in their network.
Should this article be declared unconstitutional, the SCJN would have to give the sector regulator, the Federal Telecommunications Institute (IFT) the power to regulate these rates directly.
The possible resolution has caused varied reactions among América Móvil’s competitors, warning of possible adverse effects; “It has been proven over time that the most rapid and efficient way to bring more advanced networks to a country’s consumers and businesses is through free and open markets, private investment and growth-oriented policies,” said AT&T. “The effective and lasting implementation of these reforms will generate greater investment, which will benefit consumers and businesses, as well as a healthier environment for economic growth.”
Meanwhile, 3rd place Telefónica says that “the business model of our competitors has been built on the permanence of the existing legal framework, so that its disappearance would have serious consequences on the sustainability and composition of the sector.”
Full Content: El Economista
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Massachusetts AG Sues Insulin Makers and PBMs Over Alleged Price-Fixing Scheme
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Apple and Amazon Avoid Mass Lawsuit in UK Over Alleged Collusion
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Top Agent Network Drops Antitrust Suit Against National Association of Realtors
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Weil, Gotshal & Manges Strengthens Antitrust Practice with New Partner
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Russian Court Imposes Hefty Fine on Google for Non-Compliance with Content Removal Orders
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand