OpenAI, the renowned artificial intelligence research laboratory, and its financial backer Microsoft (MSFT.O) are facing a legal battle in Manhattan federal court. Nonfiction authors Nicholas Basbanes and Nicholas Gage filed a proposed class action lawsuit on Friday, claiming that the companies violated their copyrights by improperly using their works to train AI models, including the popular chatbot ChatGPT and other artificial intelligence-based services.
Basbanes and Gage allege that their books were included as part of the data used to train OpenAI’s GPT large language model, leading to copyright infringement. The writers argue that OpenAI and Microsoft misused their creative works without proper compensation or authorization.
As of now, representatives for Microsoft and OpenAI have not responded to requests for comment on the complaint.
Related: UK Competition Watchdog Investigates Microsoft-OpenAI Partnership
This lawsuit is part of a growing trend, with various authors, both from fiction and nonfiction genres, taking legal action against tech companies for allegedly using their work to train AI programs. Comedian Sarah Silverman and “Game of Thrones” author George R.R. Martin are among the notable figures who have filed similar lawsuits in recent times.
In a recent development, The New York Times also joined the legal fray by suing OpenAI and Microsoft last week over the alleged use of its journalists’ work in training AI applications.
Nicholas Basbanes and Nicholas Gage, both former journalists, are represented by their lawyer, Michael Richter. Richter expressed his outrage at the situation, stating, “It is outrageous that these companies could use their works to power a new billion-dollar-plus industry without any compensation.”
The outcome of this lawsuit could have significant implications for the intersection of intellectual property and artificial intelligence, as it raises questions about the ethical use of creative works in the development of advanced AI technologies.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Judge Dismisses Antitrust Lawsuit Against Ivy League Over Athletic Scholarships
Oct 11, 2024 by
CPI
FTC and DOJ Revamp Merger Guidelines to Identify Illegal Transactions More Efficiently
Oct 11, 2024 by
CPI
US Consumer Watchdog Eyes Expansion of ‘Junk Fee’ Crackdown Ahead of 2024 Election
Oct 10, 2024 by
CPI
Brazil Proposes Reform to Competition Law Targeting Big Tech
Oct 10, 2024 by
CPI
Meta Enhances User Data Control, Resolving German Antitrust Dispute
Oct 10, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Refusal to Deal
Sep 27, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust’s Refusal-to-Deal Doctrine: The Emperor Has No Clothes
Sep 27, 2024 by
Erik Hovenkamp
Why All Antitrust Claims are Refusal to Deal Claims and What that Means for Policy
Sep 27, 2024 by
Ramsi Woodcock
The Aspen Misadventure
Sep 27, 2024 by
Roger Blair & Holly P. Stidham
Refusal to Deal in Antitrust Law: Evolving Jurisprudence and Business Justifications in the Align Technology Case
Sep 27, 2024 by
Timothy Hsieh