This article explores the standing of state attorneys general to bring actions to protect the quasi-sovereign interests of their states and citizenries. Known as parens patriae, this form of standing is unique to the sovereign and began as a strictly common law concept, but has been codified in state and federal statutes alike. The article explores the historical development of parens patriae, and the test for determining whether an asserted interest is “quasi-sovereign” as articulated by the United States Supreme Court in Alfred L. Snapp & Son, Inc., v. Puerto Rico, 458 U.S. 592 (1982). The article concludes by offering some practical suggestions for avoiding the pitfalls that often arise when settlement negotiations – especially those arising out of antitrust cases and investigations – address the issue of parens patriae authority.
Featured News
Google Faces DOJ’s Final Arguments in Antitrust Showdown Over Ad Tech
Nov 25, 2024 by
CPI
Meta Faces April Trial Over FTC Antitrust Allegations
Nov 25, 2024 by
CPI
UK Watchdog Clears Spreadex Sale of Sporting Index Amid Monopoly Fears
Nov 25, 2024 by
CPI
UniCredit Shakes Up Italian Banking with €10 Billion Bid for Banco BPM
Nov 25, 2024 by
CPI
French Government in Talks to Acquire Atos’ Key Technology Assets for €500 Million
Nov 25, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Remedies Revisited
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
Fixing the Fix: Updating Policy on Merger Remedies
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
Methodology Matters: The 2017 FTC Remedies Study
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
U.S. v. AT&T: Five Lessons for Vertical Merger Enforcement
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
The Search for Antitrust Remedies in Tech Leads Beyond Antitrust
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI