The Department of Justice (DOJ) on Thursday, July 29, announced charges against Koch Foods and four Pilgrim’s Pride executives over their roles in a nationwide conspiracy to fix prices for broiler chickens.
The indictments allege that chicken producer Pilgrim’s Pride executives Jason McGuire, Timothy Stiller, Wesley “Scott” Tucker, and Justin Gay conspired to suppress competition for sales of broiler chickens, or chickens that are raised specifically for meat production and sold to grocers and restaurants, and were charged with violating the Sherman Act, according to the DOJ.
“As today’s charges show, the division remains committed to holding both individuals and companies accountable when they choose profits over following the law,” acting Assistant Attorney General Richard A. Powers of the Justice Department’s Antitrust Division said in a Thursday statement.
He added that the division’s “investigation into criminal price fixing of broiler chickens continues” and will not stop until the DOJ can “ensure that wrongdoers are held accountable and competition is restored to this critical industry.”
Koch Foods senior vice president William Kantola was one of 10 individuals charged in October of 2020 for their roles in the same conspiracy, which began in 2012 and lasted until 2019, the DOJ reported.
Pilgrim’s Pride, which is based in Colorado, pleaded guilty to the conspiracy in February of 2021, and a court ordered the company to pay a fine of US$107 million.
According to the company’s plea agreement, from as early as 2012 and continuing at least into 2017, Pilgrim’s role in the conspiracy affected at least US$361 million in Pilgrim’s sales of broiler chicken products.
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Judge Allows FTC Antitrust Case Against Amazon to Move Forward
Oct 1, 2024 by
CPI
SAP Leader Urges Caution on EU AI Rules, Warns of Competitive Disadvantage
Oct 1, 2024 by
CPI
Colorado’s Grocery Workers Unite to Oppose $24.6 Billion Supermarket Merge
Oct 1, 2024 by
CPI
Canada’s Competition Bureau Warns Businesses of Tougher Enforcement
Oct 1, 2024 by
CPI
Top Antitrust Lawyers Launch New Boutique Firm
Oct 1, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Refusal to Deal
Sep 27, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust’s Refusal-to-Deal Doctrine: The Emperor Has No Clothes
Sep 27, 2024 by
Erik Hovenkamp
Why All Antitrust Claims are Refusal to Deal Claims and What that Means for Policy
Sep 27, 2024 by
Ramsi Woodcock
The Aspen Misadventure
Sep 27, 2024 by
Roger Blair & Holly P. Stidham
Refusal to Deal in Antitrust Law: Evolving Jurisprudence and Business Justifications in the Align Technology Case
Sep 27, 2024 by
Timothy Hsieh