Posted by Social Science Research Network
Private Ordering in Chinese Antitrust
Angela Huyue Zhang (King’s College London)
Abstract: This Article begins with an inquiry into why there is a rarity of private challenges of decisions made by the Chinese antitrust authorities. The legal approach to the study of administrative law, which has received most academic attention, has not been able to provide a satisfactory answer to this question. To resolve this puzzle, this Article draws attention to the factors beyond the law, particularly the reputation sanction that Chinese antitrust agencies can strategically inflict on firms under their investigations. Based on event study methodology, I identified significant abnormal stock returns in response to an antitrust agency’s proactive public disclosure of its investigation. As the regulator has the discretion in deciding whether and when to disclose its investigation, this gives it significant clout in influencing the stock performance of firms subject to its investigation. In addition, I hand-collected data from 860 news articles on three high-profile antitrust cases and identified an editorial slant that can further inflate the reputation damage to these firms. A close review of these news articles reveals that such bias stems not only from supply but also demand factors. This Article contributes to several strands of research, particularly on the use of reputation sanction in regulation, the role of media in legal enforcement, and the limits of law in resolving administrative disputes in China.
Featured News
Massachusetts AG Sues Insulin Makers and PBMs Over Alleged Price-Fixing Scheme
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Apple and Amazon Avoid Mass Lawsuit in UK Over Alleged Collusion
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Top Agent Network Drops Antitrust Suit Against National Association of Realtors
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Weil, Gotshal & Manges Strengthens Antitrust Practice with New Partner
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Russian Court Imposes Hefty Fine on Google for Non-Compliance with Content Removal Orders
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand