The Central Operative Unit (UCO) of Spain’s Civil Guard have announced their discovery of Iberdrola emails, internal communications and Excel files that underpin the accusation against the power company for allegedly inflating the price of electricity during the fall of 2013.
The result was a very high price for electricity, leading to the opening of an investigation by the National Commission for Markets and Competition (CNMC). The agency determined in November 2015 that Iberdrola had reaped a profit of €21.5 million (US$26 million) and had caused a negative impact equivalent to a further €105 million. The process ended with a penalty of €25 million, which Iberdrola has sought to appeal.
Iberdrola alleges that the price rose because its production assets were lower than expected. This is a parameter that, presumably, in addition to water held in reservoirs, takes into account rainfall forecasts and, therefore, the ability to renew their resources and prevent the production of energy from affecting human consumption, agriculture and the environment.
However, the UCO has said it is unable to find a logical explanation or a pattern in previous years that justifies the cutback of available hydraulic energy applied by Iberdrola in December 2013, unleashing a rise in electricity prices in during a particularly sensitive period.
Full Content: El Confidencial
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Congress Pushes to Combat AI Deepfakes in Year-End Funding Deal
Dec 18, 2024 by
CPI
Epic Games Board Resignations Linked to DOJ Antitrust Investigation
Dec 18, 2024 by
CPI
Renault Supports Potential Honda-Nissan Merger Talks
Dec 18, 2024 by
CPI
South Korea’s Antitrust Body Raises Concerns Over AI Market Competition
Dec 18, 2024 by
CPI
Perplexity Caught in Crossfire as DOJ and Google Battle Over Search Dominance
Dec 18, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Remedies After Illumina/GRAIL– The Thorny Question of Proportionality
Dec 17, 2024 by
Aleksander Tombinski & Ciara Denihan
Why Was Illumina/GRAIL Blocked in the EU? Reviewing The European Commission’s Assessment of Vertical Mergers in Light of the 2022 Prohibition Decision
Dec 17, 2024 by
Will Sparks
The Role of Uncertainty in the Future European Horizontal Merger Guidelines: Lessons Learned From Illumina/GRAIL
Dec 17, 2024 by
Svend Albaek & Daniel Donath
Illumina’s Light on Article 22 EUMR: The Suspended Step and Uncertain Future of EU Merger Control Over Below-Threshold “Killer” Mergers
Dec 17, 2024 by
Anna Tzanaki
EU-Level Jurisdiction Over “Killer Acquisitions” in the Aftermath of Illumina/GRAIL
Dec 17, 2024 by
Peter Whelan