The EU Google Decisions: Extreme Enforcement or the Tip of The Behavioral Iceberg?
The recent EU Google decisions may represent a high-water mark for the use of behavioral economics in EU antitrust to date, but what do they imply for competition policy in the future? Do such cases represent the outer extremes of how far behavioral thinking can and should be taken? Or do they represent baby steps towards the more comprehensive incorporation of behavioral economics into competition policy thinking? This article highlights the widespread influence of behavioral economics across other areas of policy and discusses a number of directions in which competition policy could potentially be transformed. Noting the existence of an extensive literature in behavioral antitrust, it focuses on a number of aspects which have been given less attention to date.
Featured News
Power Industry Shake-Up: Constellation Energy to Buy Calpine in Massive $26.6B Deal
Jan 10, 2025 by
CPI
DOJ Sues to Block $570 Million Deal Between AMEX GBT and CWT
Jan 10, 2025 by
CPI
Meta Accused of Using Pirated Books to Train AI, Court Documents Reveal
Jan 9, 2025 by
CPI
Frank McCourt’s Project Liberty Eyes TikTok US Acquisition as Deadline Looms
Jan 9, 2025 by
CPI
Disney-Fubo Deal Sparks Antitrust Concerns from DirecTV, Dish, and EchoStar
Jan 9, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand