Herbert Hovenkamp, Apr 01, 2006
The success of the Areeda-Turner test for predatory pricing and the U.S. Supreme Court’s adoption of demanding proof requirements in its 1993 Brooke Group decision have made it very difficult for plaintiffs to win conventional predatory pricing claims. While many challenges to exclusionary pricing continue to be made, the legal theory has evolved away from classical predation to a variety of other theories. This paper examines the state of the law of both conventional predatory pricing and these recent variants and offers some recommendations.
Links to Full Content
Featured News
Swisscom’s Fastweb-Vodafone Italia Merger Gains Momentum with Antitrust Approval Pending
Nov 24, 2024 by
CPI
Novo Holdings Nears EU Approval for $16.5 Billion Catalent Acquisition
Nov 24, 2024 by
CPI
Australia Drops Plan to Fine Tech Giants for Misinformation Spread
Nov 24, 2024 by
CPI
Michael Jordan’s Racing Team Drops Antitrust Appeal Against NASCAR
Nov 24, 2024 by
CPI
EU Closes Apple E-Book Antitrust Probe After Complaint Dropped
Nov 24, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Remedies Revisited
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
Fixing the Fix: Updating Policy on Merger Remedies
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
Methodology Matters: The 2017 FTC Remedies Study
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
U.S. v. AT&T: Five Lessons for Vertical Merger Enforcement
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
The Search for Antitrust Remedies in Tech Leads Beyond Antitrust
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI