Posted by Social Science Research Network
John M. Newman (University of Memphis)
Abstract: Myths matter. This Article is the first to squarely confront a powerful myth that pervades modern economic, technological, and legal discourse: the Myth of Free. The prevailing view is that consumers capture massive welfare surplus from an ever-rising flood of innovative new products that are offered free of charge by firms like Google, Facebook, Pandora, and others. This windfall was made possible, we are told, by the convergence of digitization and networking, which eliminated the marginal costs of such products. Free was born, heralding the end of scarcity and an age of abundance.
But that orthodox origin story is fatally flawed. This Article first formalizes, then deconstructs, the Myth of Free. Unsurprisingly, given its faulty premises, the Myth’s conclusion is incorrect: there is still “no such thing as a free lunch.” Free does not signal the end of capitalism or the demise of standard economic theory.
Moreover, the Myth of Free is not benign. It has led to an undeserved protected status for certain suppliers, who receive legal immunity or favorable treatment in close cases involving contract, antitrust, consumer protection, and privacy laws. It has motivated policy proposals that would eliminate market interventions or (paradoxically) competitive markets themselves, without adequate justification in either case. Worse yet, policies designed for a post-scarcity world necessarily overlook the persistent problems attendant to scarcity. This Article seeks to dispel the Myth of Free before it can wreak further harm.
Featured News
Judge Appoints Law Firms to Lead Consumer Antitrust Litigation Against Apple
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Epic Health Systems Seeks Dismissal of Antitrust Suit Filed by Particle Health
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Qualcomm Secures Partial Victory in Licensing Dispute with Arm, Jury Splits on Key Issues
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Google Proposes Revised Revenue-Sharing Limits Amid Antitrust Battle
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Japan’s Antitrust Authority Expected to Sanction Google Over Monopoly Practices
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand