Peter Carstensen, Dec 20, 2012
This article examines the unavoidable adverse effects on consumer choice, consumer prices, and competition in the market for the tied (as well as the tying good) that necessarily result from unjustified tying by any firm with any appreciable capacity to affect competition in the markets for either good. My thesis is not that all tying is or should be absolutely illegal, but rather it ought to remain presumptively illegal and should be condemned after only a “quick look” unless the defendant can plead and prove a legitimate justification, i.e., one that does not involve primarily exploiting customers or excluding competitors.
Featured News
Google Revamps Android App Store Rules, Cuts Fees Amid Global Antitrust Pressure
Mar 4, 2026 by
CPI
White House Reviews Tencent’s Gaming Stakes as Trump Prepares for China Visit
Mar 4, 2026 by
CPI
Charles River Associates Adds Senior Consultant to Antitrust Practice
Mar 4, 2026 by
CPI
DOJ Investigates Major Fertilizer Producers Over Possible Price Coordination
Mar 4, 2026 by
CPI
NY Bill Would Bar AI Chatbots From Providing ‘Substantive’ Medical or Legal Responses
Mar 4, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Behavioral Economics
Feb 22, 2026 by
CPI
Behavioral Antitrust in 2026
Feb 22, 2026 by
Maurice Stucke
Behavioral Economics in Competition Policy: Going Beyond Inertia and Framing Effects
Feb 22, 2026 by
Annemieke Tuinstra & Richard May
Agreeing to Disagree in Antitrust
Feb 22, 2026 by
Jorge Padilla
Recognizing What’s Around the Corner: Merger Control, Capabilities, and the New Nature of Potential Competition
Feb 22, 2026 by
Magdalena Kuyterink & David J. Teece