Facebook is facing breakup calls from a handful of advocacy groups that want the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to explore breaking up the social media giant.
The Wall Street Journal, citing a draft letter from the advocacy groups, reported that among the fixes in light of the Cambridge Analytica scandal in which the now-defunct political consulting firm accessed the data on 87 million users without their permission, is to spin out WhatsApp and Instagram. The group argued in the draft letter that Facebook should be forced to unwind those acquisitions because it didn’t protect users’ data.
The FTC is about to complete an investigation into the data breach and whether Facebook violated a consent decree reached in 2011 and could levy Facebook with a sizeable fine, reported The Wall Street Journal. “Facebook has operated for too long with too little accountability,” said Marc Rotenberg, president of the Electronic Privacy Information Center, one of the groups likely to sign the letter. Others advocates calling for the breakup include Color of Change and Open Markets Institute, noted the report.
The paper noted that the FTC, which has been shut down along with other parts of the government, didn’t respond to a request for comment. A person familiar with Facebook’s thinking said the social media company doesn’t think the FTC has the ability on a legal basis to call for a breakup if it found it violated the consent decree. In 2011, the FTC stated that Facebook deceived customers by sharing data it said it was kept private. The consent decree was inked in 2012.
If Facebook settles again with the FTC this time around, the paper reported Facebook will likely have to pay a large fine and face a stricter consent decree. But the advocacy groups think that’s not enough. They say the FTC should break up Facebook to send a message. Despite the advocacy groups’ efforts, the WSJ noted that it’s not likely the FTC, which is now controlled by a Republican majority, would back a breakup of the social media giant.
Featured News
Judge Appoints Law Firms to Lead Consumer Antitrust Litigation Against Apple
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Epic Health Systems Seeks Dismissal of Antitrust Suit Filed by Particle Health
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Qualcomm Secures Partial Victory in Licensing Dispute with Arm, Jury Splits on Key Issues
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Google Proposes Revised Revenue-Sharing Limits Amid Antitrust Battle
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Japan’s Antitrust Authority Expected to Sanction Google Over Monopoly Practices
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand