New Reality Check: The Paycheck-to-Paycheck Report

Despite Strong Job Market, Paycheck-to-Paycheck Workers Worry More About Job Prospects

December 2024

Consumers living paycheck to paycheck seek more financial stability, which often means a new job or promotion. Good news: consumers at large describe an improved job market, especially high-skilled technology workers. Paycheck-to-paycheck workers may not be hearing this good news, however, as they report feeling more worried about finding and keeping jobs than their financially secure peers.

Get Unlimited Access
Complete the form below for free, unlimited access to all our Data Studies, Trackers, and MonitorEdge reports.

Thank you for registering. Please confirm your email to view all our Trackers.

    yesSubscribe to our daily newsletter, PYMNTS Today.

    By completing this form, you agree to receive marketing communications from PYMNTS and to the sharing of your information with our sponsor, if applicable, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.

    More than one-third of working consumers believe they have better opportunities for career advancement now than in recent years. Although high-skilled technology or technical workers are most likely to feel bullish, data reveals that various workers feel more optimistic than average. These include physically demanding occupations and trained education workers.

    Paycheck-to-paycheck workers are less likely to share that optimism. More U.S. consumers now fit under this umbrella — 67%, including a 24% share of consumers with this lifestyle who struggle to pay bills. They actively seek better-paying jobs to build financial stability, and an improved market for promotions in the field could help.

    Paycheck-to-paycheck workers’ sentiment on job prospects skews more pessimistic. They are more likely to report facing job market obstacles than their financially secure counterparts. They also report more rejected applications, unsuccessful interviews and stronger layoff fears.

    It’s important to note that these figures still represent more optimism than pessimism. Nearly one-third of consumers living paycheck to paycheck with issues paying bills still believe career advancement opportunities have improved.

    However, data ultimately reveals disparities in job market experiences between paycheck-to-paycheck workers and those who are more financially secure.

    These are just some of the findings in “New Reality Check: The Paycheck-to-Paycheck Report,” a PYMNTS Intelligence exclusive report. This edition examines paycheck-to-paycheck consumers’ outlooks on career advancement and draws on insights from a survey of 2,959 consumers conducted from Nov. 8 to Nov. 22. The report reveals consumers’ nuanced sentiments towards the job market and their perceived ability to advance in their fields and gain the financial stability they crave.

    Stronger Job Market Marked By Cross-Field Optimism

    Many workers across career types say that advancement prospects are better than three years ago, although office workers are less optimistic than average.

    Individuals across several career paths report career advancement prospects have improved compared to three years ago. Approximately 58% of high-skill tech workers shared this sentiment, along with 45% of workers in physically demanding roles and qualified education workers. These are diverse groups of workers who are bullish about career prospects, highlighting widespread optimism.

    For all career types surveyed, more workers reported improved career prospects than worse ones.

    AI may be a key factor differentiating worker types who are more optimistic versus those who lean the other way. Office workers were least likely to report opportunities for advancement had improved (31%) and essentially tied for most likely to report worse opportunities (23%). Back-end and customer-facing retail and service workers also exhibited relatively muted optimism. Common GenAI uses include automated office functions, and AI can also disrupt customer service and retail inventory roles.

    High-skilled tech workers and qualified education workers are not immune to AI’s progress, of course. However, each role could be more likely to deploy AI strategically than to be replaced by AI — time will tell.

    Paycheck-To-Paycheck Workers Perceive Shaky Career Prospects

    Workers living paycheck to paycheck and struggling to pay bills are twice as likely as financially stable workers to believe career prospects are worsening.

    A way for paycheck-to-paycheck individuals to build financial stability is to get and hold a higher-paying job. The latest data confirms that they feel this is much easier said than done. Despite general widespread bullishness, PYMNTS Intelligence’s research finds that financially strained consumers are 34% likelier than the sample average to think career advancement has grown more difficult over the past three years.

    Similarly, 37% of surveyed workers believe career opportunities are better than they were three years ago, but that share drops to 32% among workers living paycheck-to-paycheck with issues paying bills. That 12% drop is notable, but should not be overstated. After all, nearly one in three financially struggling workers believe they have better paths to advancement than they used to.

    Job Insecurity Worries Paycheck-to-Paycheck Workers

    Workers living paycheck to paycheck are much more worried about losing their jobs than their more financially secure peers.

    Losing one’s job is a common fear, with PYMNTS Intelligence research finding that 31% of employed individuals are concerned about being laid off in the next 12 months. Fears worsen for workers without financial stability: 43% of those living paycheck to paycheck with trouble paying bills fear layoffs.

    One possible explanation for this heightened fear is that those living paycheck to paycheck are closer to losing what they have than more financially secure consumers. By definition, consumers not living paycheck to paycheck have the capacity to save, and PYMNTS Intelligence data confirms that this link exists. That also means these consumers may have backup plans their paycheck-to-paycheck peers lack should they need to ride out a period of unemployment. Paycheck-to-paycheck households, as the label implies, could face severe financial troubles with just one missed paycheck.

    Another explanation backed up by PYMNTS Intelligence research is that paycheck-to-paycheck workers have, on average, been employees for a shorter period of time. Last-in, first-out conventions mean these workers could be more likely to be on the chopping block if layoffs come around. PYMNTS Intelligence found that 18% of consumers who struggle to pay bills have been employed at their current job for less than one year. Only 10% of paycheck-to-paycheck workers not struggling to cover bills and 9.2% of workers not living paycheck-to-paycheck have been at their jobs for that short a time period.

    Financially secure workers are also much more likely to be at their jobs for longer than five years. Per the same conventions, they could be more protected from layoffs.

    Paycheck-to-Paycheck Workers Say It Is Harder To Find Work

    Paycheck-to-paycheck individuals submit more job applications and report having trouble standing out to potential employers.

    Further hindering paycheck-to-paycheck workers’ abilities to improve their own financial situation is their perceived difficulty in finding new work. PYMNTS Intelligence research finds that 23% of paycheck-to-paycheck workers worry about their ability to pass interviews or assessments. Among their peers who do not live paycheck to paycheck, only 16% share that worry. Another 26% of paycheck-to-paycheck workers with trouble paying bills say they have difficulty standing out and getting noticed by employers. Just 17% of financially secure workers said the same.

    One way to measure this struggle for new employment is job application volume. Struggling paycheck-to-paycheck workers are almost 120% more likely to have applied for more than 20 jobs before landing their current position than those not living paycheck to paycheck. They are also 38% less likely to be recruited or referred for a job. Several explanations include a higher likelihood of working in retail or customer service positions — which may lack desired experience for other positions — and having smaller social networks, perhaps due to working lower-wage jobs with higher turnover.

    These problems with job seeking could also stem from a relative lack of education compared to financially secure peers. Less than one-third of struggling and non-struggling paycheck-to-paycheck consumers have a college or postgraduate degree (22% and 31%, respectively). Data reveals that 43% of consumers not living paycheck to paycheck have that education. If this proves to be a major factor, it is not an easily solved problem considering college degrees’ sheer cost — as well as the opportunity cost of attending classes instead of working more hours for pay.

    Read More

    PYMNTS Intelligence is the leading provider of information on the trends driving the paycheck-to-paycheck economy. To stay up to date, subscribe to our newsletters and read our in-depth reports.

    Methodology

    Despite Strong Job Market, Paycheck-to-Paycheck Workers Worry More About Job Prospects,” is based on 2,959 responses gathered from Nov. 8 to Nov. 22. The report details paycheck-to-paycheck workers’ career outlooks. Our sample was balanced to match the U.S. adult population in a set of key demographic variables: 51% of respondents identified as female, 33% were college-educated and 30% declared incomes of between $50,000 and $100,000 per year.

    About

    PYMNTS INTELLIGENCE

    PYMNTS Intelligence is a leading global data and analytics platform that uses proprietary data and methods to provide actionable insights on what’s now and what’s next in payments, commerce and the digital economy. Its team of data scientists include leading economists, econometricians, survey experts, financial analysts and marketing scientists with deep experience in the application of data to the issues that define the future of the digital transformation of the global economy. This multi-lingual team has conducted original data collection and analysis in more than three dozen global markets for some of the world’s leading publicly traded and privately held firms.

    The PYMNTS Intelligence team that produced this report:
    Scott Murray: SVP and Head of Analytics
    Mariah Warner: Senior Research Manager
    Andrew Rathkopf: Senior Writer
    Matt Vuchichevich: Content Editor, Head of Reports


    We are interested in your feedback on this report. If you have questions or comments, or if you would like to subscribe to this report, please email us at feedback@pymnts.com.

    Disclaimer

    New Reality Check: The Paycheck-to-Paycheck Report Series may be updated periodically. While reasonable efforts are made to keep the content accurate and up to date, PYMNTS MAKES NO REPRESENTATIONS OR WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, REGARDING THE CORRECTNESS, ACCURACY, COMPLETENESS, ADEQUACY, OR RELIABILITY OF OR THE USE OF OR RESULTS THAT MAY BE GENERATED FROM THE USE OF THE INFORMATION OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL SATISFY YOUR REQUIREMENTS OR EXPECTATIONS. THE CONTENT IS PROVIDED “AS IS” AND ON AN “AS AVAILABLE” BASIS. YOU EXPRESSLY AGREE THAT YOUR USE OF THE CONTENT IS AT YOUR SOLE RISK. PYMNTS SHALL HAVE NO LIABILITY FOR ANY INTERRUPTIONS IN THE CONTENT THAT IS PROVIDED AND DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES WITH REGARD TO THE CONTENT, INCLUDING THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, AND NONINFRINGEMENT AND TITLE. SOME JURISDICTIONS DO NOT ALLOW THE EXCLUSION OF CERTAIN WARRANTIES, AND, IN SUCH CASES, THE STATED EX CLUSIONS DO NOT APPLY. PYMNTS RESERVES THE RIGHT AND SHOULD NOT BE LIABLE SHOULD IT EXERCISE ITS RIGHT TO MODIFY, INTERRUPT, OR DISCONTINUE THE AVAILABILITY OF THE CONTENT OR ANY COMPONENT OF IT WITH OR WITHOUT NOTICE.
    PYMNTS SHALL NOT BE LIABLE FOR ANY DAMAGES WHATSOEVER, AND, IN PARTICULAR, SHALL NOT BE LIABLE FOR ANY SPECIAL, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR INCIDENTAL DAMAGES, OR DAMAGES FOR LOST PROFITS, LOSS OF REVENUE, OR LOSS OF USE, ARISING OUT OF OR RELATED TO THE CONTENT, WHETHER SUCH DAMAGES ARISE IN CONTRACT, NEGLIGENCE, TORT, UNDER STATUTE, IN EQUITY, AT LAW, OR OTHERWISE, EVEN IF PYMNTS HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES.
    SOME JURISDICTIONS DO NOT ALLOW FOR THE LIMITATION OR EXCLUSION OF LIABILITY FOR INCIDENTAL OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES, AND IN SUCH CASES SOME OF THE ABOVE LIMITATIONS DO NOT APPLY. THE ABOVE DISCLAIMERS AND LIMITATIONS ARE PROVIDED BY PYMNTS AND ITS PARENTS, AFFILIATED AND RELATED COMPANIES, CONTRACTORS, AND SPONSORS, AND EACH OF ITS RESPECTIVE DIRECTORS, OFFICERS, MEMBERS, EMPLOYEES, AGENTS, CONTENT COMPONENT PROVIDERS, LICENSORS, AND ADVISERS.
    Components of the content original to and the compilation produced by PYMNTS is the property of PYMNTS and cannot be reproduced without its prior written permission.