New Study Shows Inflation’s Impact on How Families Spend in Stores and on Travel
July 2024
We know parents with children at home usually spend more than other types of families on groceries, retail goods and even travel services. However, parents’ spending has significantly decreased in the past year, while the spending levels of households without children have remained consistent. This trend reflects fears about household budgets. Families are cutting discretionary spending as they wrestle with economic uncertainty.
• 62% of married parents with children at home reported annual household incomes of $100,000 or more.
• Married parents were 36% more likely to complete a retail purchase in the last 30 days than single consumers without children at home.
• Married parents with children at home were 77% more likely to complete a travel purchase recently than married couples without children living at home.
Register for Unlimited Access Complete the form below to enjoy free, unlimited access to all our Trackers, Studies and MonitorEdge Reports.
Thank you for registering. Please confirm your email to view all our Trackers.
Parents with children at home are now thinking twice before spending their hard-earned money on retail or travel. Higher incomes are supposed to give them more spending power, but their recent cuts in discretionary spending show the impact of financial uncertainty.
Caring for kids can create unpredictable retail and travel needs that spur further spending. This dynamic reinforces the spending habits of many families with children at home — especially their more frequent retail purchases. Yet, as this report shows, despite their higher incomes, parents are becoming more cautious with their expenditures. They are balancing the need to provide for their children with the uncertainties of the current economic landscape.
These are some of the findings detailed in this report. Our insights come from a census-balanced survey of 2,789 U.S. consumers conducted between May 10 and May 28.
Married consumers with children at home tend to have the highest household incomes. This is particularly true when there are two working adults in the house. This trend is consistent across the age groups most likely to have children living at home. For example, most married millennial parents with children at home (64%) have an annual household income of more than $100,000. This dual-income advantage lets at least some parents cover increased spending in retail and travel in response to their children’s needs. It may also inform household formation in the first place.
57%
of married parents are millennials.
Meanwhile, both single parents with children at home and individuals without children at home report lower average household incomes. This is likely due to the absence of a second income earner. In fact, 62% of single Generation X parents with children at home and 81% of single millennial parents with kids in the house report household incomes of less than $100,000. The greater economic stability among married parents can ideally support greater financial flexibility and spending capacity. However, households with or without kids at home have unique spending priorities and can occupy very different financial positions. Retailers and service providers need targeted strategies to address these differences.
In short, parents are not a homogenous group. Retailers and service providers must understand the economic disparities between households. Targeted strategies should consider the financial constraints of parents who earn less and the possible flexibility of those who earn more. This approach can help anchor a market differentiation strategy. Ensuring marketing efforts are more comprehensive and inclusive in scope is also essential.
Parents with Children at Home Are More Likely to Spend on Retail Purchases
At first glance, data suggests that targeting parents with children still living at home is crucial for retailers. But a deeper dive into our findings shows that single consumers without children at home could be a group as interesting for merchants as parents with kids at home. For example, married consumers with children decreased their retail spending from an average of $147 in 2022 to $114 in 2024.
For instance, 32% of these married parents recently purchased clothing and accessories, compared to 18% of married consumers without children at home. Likewise, 16% of married parents’ most recent retail purchases were related to hobbies, products common for kids.
1 in 3
married parents with kids living at home purchased clothing and accessories in their last transaction.
Moreover, married parents with children at home are more likely to buy consumer electronics and sporting goods than consumers without children at home. For example, 13% of these married parents’ most recent transactions were for consumer electronics, compared to 3.3% of married individuals without children at home. Similarly, 11% of married parents bought sporting goods, compared to 3.7% of single consumers without kids in their households.
These trends emphasize the need for targeted strategies to effectively reach and engage this demographic. Merchants that do so effectively may be able to maximize retail sales even as parents spend less on retail overall. In this environment, retailers must compete for fewer dollars.
Parents Are More Likely to Book Trips, But Non-Parents Spend More
Families with children at home are more likely to make travel purchases than those without young children. However, they also continue to spend less on travel year over year. This pullback in spending suggests these households are trying to manage expenses even if they must make more travel purchases than their childless counterparts.
Factors such as planning around spring breaks and summer vacations likely influence families’ travel spending behavior. Single-parent households are no exception. For example, these families were 39% more likely to make travel purchases than single consumers without children at home.
Meanwhile, households without children usually spend more money on their trips — up to 38% more.
Married consumers without children at home are helping to keep the overall spending of households without children on travel services elevated. These households are spending the most on travel this year: $620 on average compared to married parents, at $326. Spending by older individuals without children at home may explain why spending by households without children is 90% higher than what parents spend. Notably, married baby boomers and seniors without children at home spend $754 on average for travel services. This is significantly more than any other type of household.
This spending behavior presents a substantial business opportunity for travel-related merchants targeting high-spending segments.
TRAVELING WITH KIDS
Married parents with children at home were 77% more likely to make travel purchases than married individuals without children in their households.
But not every set of married parents falls into this category. On average, married parents have spent 11% less on travel services in 2024 compared to last year. This decrease suggests that travel-related merchants may need to make strategic adjustments to attract and retain this crucial segment.
Conclusion
Retail and travel spending among families with children has shown notable downward shifts in the past two years. This decline contrasts with households without children, whose spending remained relatively stable. Economic uncertainty and concerns about household budgets are likely driving these reductions in discretionary spending.
Likewise, parents are spending less per trip compared to previous years. Households without children, particularly those comprised of older individuals, spend the most on travel. This suggests that while parents with children at home continue to travel, they’re more budget-conscious. This development highlights a significant business opportunity for travel-related merchants to differentiate themselves through value-driven offerings.
Families with two working adults tend to have higher incomes. However, this dual-income advantage must still compete with the higher spending that comes with meeting children’s wants and needs. Retailers must adjust their marketing and strategy to align with these trends. Merchants that do so can gain a crucial competitive advantage and may be able to capture a greater share of families’ spend.
Methodology
“The Last Transaction: Family Spending Habits Reveal Merchant Opportunities in Retail and Travel,” a PYMNTS Intelligence exclusive report, explores how consumers completed their last transaction and the latest trends in payment preferences across demographic groups and retail sectors. This data is vital for understanding recent shifts in purchasing behaviors. For this report, we surveyed 2,789 U.S. consumers between May 10 and May 28. Our sample was balanced to match the U.S. adult population in a set of key demographic variables: 51% of respondents identified as female, 35% were college educated and 38% declared incomes of more than $100,000 per year.
PYMNTS Intelligence is a leading global data and analytics platform that uses proprietary data and methods to provide actionable insights on what’s now and what’s next in payments, commerce and the digital economy. Its team of data scientists include leading economists, econometricians, survey experts, financial analysts and marketing scientists with deep experience in the application of data to the issues that define the future of the digital transformation of the global economy. This multi-lingual team has conducted original data collection and analysis in more than three dozen global markets for some of the world’s leading publicly traded and privately held firms.
The PYMNTS Intelligence team that produced this report:
SVP and Head of Analytics: Scott Murray
Managing Director: Aitor Ortiz
Senior Analyst: Lauren Chojnacki, PhD
Senior Writer: Adam Putz, PhD
Content Editor: Matthew Koslowski
We are interested in your feedback on this report. If you have questions
or
comments, or if you would like to subscribe to this report, please email
us at
feedback@pymnts.com.
Disclaimer
The Last Transaction Report may be updated periodically. While reasonable efforts are made to keep the content accurate and up to date, PYMNTS MAKES NO REPRESENTATIONS OR WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, REGARDING THE CORRECTNESS, ACCURACY, COMPLETENESS, ADEQUACY, OR RELIABILITY OF OR THE USE OF OR RESULTS THAT MAY BE GENERATED FROM THE USE OF THE INFORMATION OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL SATISFY YOUR REQUIREMENTS OR EXPECTATIONS. THE CONTENT IS PROVIDED “AS IS” AND ON AN “AS AVAILABLE” BASIS. YOU EXPRESSLY AGREE THAT YOUR USE OF THE CONTENT IS AT YOUR SOLE RISK. PYMNTS SHALL HAVE NO LIABILITY FOR ANY INTERRUPTIONS IN THE CONTENT THAT IS PROVIDED AND DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES WITH REGARD TO THE CONTENT, INCLUDING THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, AND NONINFRINGEMENT AND TITLE. SOME JURISDICTIONS DO NOT ALLOW THE EXCLUSION OF CERTAIN WARRANTIES, AND, IN SUCH CASES, THE STATED EXCLUSIONS DO NOT APPLY. PYMNTS RESERVES THE RIGHT AND SHOULD NOT BE LIABLE SHOULD IT EXERCISE ITS RIGHT TO MODIFY, INTERRUPT, OR DISCONTINUE THE AVAILABILITY OF THE CONTENT OR ANY COMPONENT OF IT WITH OR WITHOUT NOTICE.
PYMNTS SHALL NOT BE LIABLE FOR ANY DAMAGES WHATSOEVER, AND, IN PARTICULAR, SHALL NOT BE LIABLE FOR ANY SPECIAL, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR INCIDENTAL DAMAGES, OR DAMAGES FOR LOST PROFITS, LOSS OF REVENUE, OR LOSS OF USE, ARISING OUT OF OR RELATED TO THE CONTENT, WHETHER SUCH DAMAGES ARISE IN CONTRACT, NEGLIGENCE, TORT, UNDER STATUTE, IN EQUITY, AT LAW, OR OTHERWISE, EVEN IF PYMNTS HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES.
SOME JURISDICTIONS DO NOT ALLOW FOR THE LIMITATION OR EXCLUSION OF LIABILITY FOR INCIDENTAL OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES, AND IN SUCH CASES SOME OF THE ABOVE LIMITATIONS DO NOT APPLY. THE ABOVE DISCLAIMERS AND LIMITATIONS ARE PROVIDED BY PYMNTS AND ITS PARENTS, AFFILIATED AND RELATED COMPANIES, CONTRACTORS, AND SPONSORS, AND EACH OF ITS RESPECTIVE DIRECTORS, OFFICERS, MEMBERS, EMPLOYEES, AGENTS, CONTENT COMPONENT PROVIDERS, LICENSORS, AND ADVISERS.
Components of the content original to and the compilation produced by PYMNTS is the property of PYMNTS and cannot be reproduced without its prior written permission.