Authors:
Oren Bar-Gill (New York University – School of Law)
Elizabeth Warren (Harvard Law School)
Abstract:
Physical products, from toasters and lawnmowers to infant car seats and toys to meat and drugs, are routinely inspected and regulated for safety. Credit products, like mortgage loans and credit cards, on the other hand, are left largely unregulated, even though they can also be unsafe. Because financial products are analyzed through a contract paradigm rather than a products paradigm, consumers have been left with unsafe credit products. These dangerous products can lead to financial distress, bankruptcy and foreclosure, and, as evidenced by the recent subprime crisis, they can have devastating effects on communities and on the economy. In this Article, we use the physical products analogy to build a case, supported by both theory and data, for comprehensive safety regulation of consumer credit. We then examine the current state of consumer credit regulation, explaining why the current regulatory regime has systematically failed to provide meaningful safety regulations. We propose a fundamental restructuring of this regime, urging the creation of a new federal regulator that will have both the authority and the incentives to police the safety of consumer credit products. Read Paper
Elizabeth Warren Bound for Treasury Role, But What About the CFPB?
The Consumer Financial Protection Board: Insights from Elizabeth Warren’s “Making Credit Safer”
Briefing Room: Dealing with Durbin
We’re always on the lookout for opportunities to partner with innovators and disruptors.
Learn More